cleaning a sex doll
[block id=”blogads”]
(100 Likes) Which Star Trek character(s) would you like to be removed from future movies/series and why?
father again. Data was the Anime Sex Doll, the restless mix of Pinocchio and the Tin Woodman from THE WIZARD OF OZ.—I didn’t like either of them. So much time was lost with TNG obsessed with Data’s sense of humor; Data’s “creativity;”. Data’s cat; Data’s recitals; blah, blah, blah. In a sense, he was supposed to be a “Curious Boy,” but NOBODY in the confined environment of a spacecraft could stand Data’s intrusions and his obsessive quest for what it means to be a “real boy.” No one could stand all this from Westley Crusher. No one has endured ANYTHING from Westley Crusher. He was a hardworking kid to shut up about it – even when he had valid questions!! But NOT Data. Data character crossed the line when we got to “If he can do X, why can’t he do Y”. Why can’t he have sex with Tasha? clean up sex doll be? Just eXXXw. Essentially, Tasha had herself a realistic inflatable doll that was “fully functional.” Wow, wow, wow, wow!! The world is full of things that just because we can do it doesn’t mean we should. And if we do, we shouldn’t tell anyone we did it!! Then Data spawns – first a strange life LIKE creature, a strange girl with questionable fashion sense transforms into an android, and the android head tilts to one side attractively. But STARFLEET wants him – he wants Picard (the STAR of the show, let’s remember!!) to make an effective defense about the nature of family. Then he dies and the TNG writer sheds huge tears from the audience. Data. Data. Data. Data. Largely TNG gradually BECOME A “Data Show”. And honestly, at that point, I watched less. Like this. I’m sorry to those who LOVED Data because I treated your man with less than respect. But I can’t lie:
(95 Likes) What do you think of the pilots seeing a human in a jetpack at 3000 feet near LAX on 9/01/20? Is this a hoax or a visual distortion?
(in Sydney) On a Piper Warrior on runway 11L – out of the corner of my eye – when I saw ANOTHER plane – apparently in the final – but outside clean up sex doll You went. Now my mind was racing – if I was planning to land on runway 11 LEFT – and he was at the end directly to my left – I had no idea where to land – except maybe the parallel taxiway – so naturally I freaked out. I called ATC and initiated an emergency “turn” and clearance to climb to 1000’s circuit altitude. Confused at first, Sex Doll Torso let me. Then I explained the situation. It turned out to be a very large model airplane flying illegally near the GA airport. It seemed real to me and f
(33 Likes) I’m 18 years old and I have a job. Do you mind if I still like dolls? It sounds childish, but I really like them.
You must see my doll collection. I have collector’s Barbies and lots of porcelain, many of which resemble the characters of my books, but my favorites clean up sex doll My Asian Ball-Jointed Babies, many of whom are also dressed as characters from my books. Try stopping by and joining us: Dollieh Sanctuary There are many of us who are much older than you. Even a few mothers with teenage daughters who love both
(81 Likes) Are sex dolls that look like children illegal? Can they be used to safely control the desires of pedophiles?
I’m going to establish some facts and personal background before I actually answer. I am a victim of childhood abuse by both approved pedophiles and child abusers. I have written extensively on this subject and some of the articles are on my profile. I am not a pedophile or someone who sexually abuses or abuses children. Pedophilia, or sexual attraction to pre-teens, is something that occurs in some people, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It is not something one chooses to be, it cannot be conditioned into or out of them. As far as we know, it is very possible that some people are born pedophiles and there is nothing that can be done about it. Most of the sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but by garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society right now when it comes to pedophiles is that we demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is clearly a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t curb their lure is completely ignored, and we lump people who are pedophiles but who don’t actually take any action (including watching child pornography) with those who do. Because of this stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on this topic, and which research is heavily dependent on pedophiles who offend as the subject. Non-offending pedophiles rarely participate in studies because of the stigma associated with being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society, the goal is and should be to reduce the harm done to children when it comes to dealing with pedophiles. In other words, there should be less abuse of children, whatever the goal. If you look at it from this angle, when it comes to sex dolls that look like pre-teens, the answer is that we should eventually let them if it lessens the harm done to real children. As for whether they actually reduce harm to children, we don’t have enough data to say one way or another. Evidence suggests that if they have access to a way of sexually relieving themselves, such as with a doll, it makes them less likely to offend a pedophile. There is no evidence to suggest that any increase in activity, such as using dolls, will increase the likelihood that someone will abuse children. We can speculate that people are less likely to take action, similar to the massive amount of evidence that shows that people who play violent video games are less likely to engage in violence in real life, and that as porn use increases, people are less likely to commit sexual assault. on impulses with a real boy, if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way criminal pedophiles actually start committing crimes is by watching and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is also wrong because you have to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn’t abuse children will make it less likely that any pedophile who falls prey to child pornography will do so. This also leads us to the logical conclusion, if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would it be allowed? As animation gets better, this may one day be possible. These are tough ethical issues that need to be addressed. The thing is, it personally bothers me and makes me nauseous. The idea of someone using a childlike sex doll and watching animated porn of people having sex with children is repulsive (and personally triggers me). However, we must not forget that we have a goal in mind, and that the goal is less abuse and harm to children. So if something that offends and disgusts us but that hurts no child will make real children less harmed, I’m in for it. So I lean towards no on whether they should be illegal or not. They should be allowed and more scientific work should be done to make them truly do what we hope: making pedophiles less aggressive. I’d probably be in favor of having them prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that who would monitor the person using them and make sure they don’t harm a real child. However, this is out of my wheelhouse. Are they promoting and normalizing a cultural climate that condone child abuse and pedophilia? Why or why not? In no way does it create anything condoning child abuse. There is no slippery slope here. This has come up in countless other industries. Do movies and games depicting violence condone real violence? All the evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humming Real Babies can separate fantasy from reality, and so we can actually enjoy fantastic things that we would never turn a blind eye to in reality. There is strong evidence that having these fantasies keeps people from doing immoral things in real life. So rape fantasies are fine, but real rape isn’t. Continues. When it comes to normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it, because we need to accept that pedophilia or people with pedophilia are normal and exist. We have to normalize their sexuality and help them act accordingly. This is really important. Normalizing child sexual abuse is not something we should ever do (and again, there is no evidence that child sex dolls do this). Getting help to normalize pedophiles by accepting their attractiveness and prevent them from harming children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who was sexually abused as a child, I am ready to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. This is to sanction the child and
(83 Likes) What is the ethical meaning of trending sex dolls?
one, because they are too primitive to be more. clean up sex doll n overpriced dildos or meat lamps. But if we get to a point where they’re half believable, I see them positively: Women can no longer use sex as a weapon. Pedophiles etc. There is a harmless release way to protect children or potential rape victims for Sex Doll Body > Fewer prostitutes